inbuxa/ihasmail-inbuxa
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #343 from Coffey-Labs/docs/features-known-issues-0.16.22

Browse Source 
Bring FEATURES and KNOWN-ISSUES up to 0.16.22
This commit is contained in:
jcoffey
2026-09-13 18:00:26 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 3dd8c7c2dd ce683f94bd
commit c587268c97
2 changed files with 18 additions and 6 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
FEATURES.md
+5 -3
View File
@@ -12,10 +12,12 @@ questions:
| [KNOWN-ISSUES.md](KNOWN-ISSUES.md) | What was verified live, and where Stalwart departs from a spec |
| [docs.ihasmail.org](https://docs.ihasmail.org) | How to install, configure and drive each of these |
Written against the tree at Stalwart **0.16.21**, which is the version the live
Written against the tree at Stalwart **0.16.22**, which is the version the live
instance runs. Behaviours carrying an older version below were checked against
that one and have not changed since; where 0.16.21 changed something, the entry
says so and names both. ihasmail
that one and have not changed since; where a later release changed something,
the entry says so and names both. 0.16.22 changed nothing described here: its
client-visible changes are in what `CalendarEvent/get` and `ContactCard/get`
return, and [KNOWN-ISSUES.md](KNOWN-ISSUES.md) lists them. ihasmail
requires 0.16 or newer and refuses older servers at sign-in, by name.
## The shape of it
KNOWN-ISSUES.md
+13 -3
View File
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ What was checked, against which server, and when. For a failure you are hitting
right now, start with [Troubleshooting](https://docs.ihasmail.org/troubleshooting/);
for what is not built yet, see [ROADMAP.md](ROADMAP.md).
The live instance runs **0.16.21**, and as of **2026-08-26 there is nothing
The live instance runs **0.16.22**, and as of **2026-08-26 there is nothing
left pending**. Most entries below were exercised against 0.16.19 on the date
they name, and the dates still say so: each upgrade since was read against the
diff rather than re-run, and nothing in those diffs touches the session
@@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ things a client can see, one of which resolved an entry below outright. The app
was run against a real 0.16.21 with mail, calendar and contacts exercised by
hand, including editing one occurrence of a recurring series through the
interface and confirming the rest of the series stayed where it was.
**0.16.22 (2026-09-13) was tested too.** The app has been tested against it on
the live instance. Its changes a client can see are all in `CalendarEvent/get`
and `ContactCard/get`, and were read from its source before the mock was made
to follow them: `baseEventId` is `null` for an event read by its stored id,
`recurrenceRule` and `recurrenceOverrides` asked for on a synthetic id come back
`null`, `useDefaultAlerts` belongs to the reader and reads `false` until set,
and an empty `properties` list returns `id` alone. None of them contradicts an
entry below.
What remains here is not a list of unknowns but of things worth knowing — where
Stalwart departs from a spec, where a setting has to be turned on for a feature
to work, and what ihasmail deliberately does not do.
@@ -60,7 +70,7 @@ works the same way — and dropped where 0.15 was the whole subject. Support for
- **Sharing a mail folder is accepted and does nothing.** `Mailbox/set` with a `shareWith` map is applied, `Mailbox/get` reads it back, and the folder never appears for the account it was shared with — **confirmed live on 0.16.19 (2026-08-27)** with a folder shared read-only to another account on the same server, which never saw it. Stalwart's own sharing documentation lists calendars, address books and file storage; mail folders are not among them. Nothing reports a failure at any point, which is the whole problem: the share is stored, so a client that trusts what it reads back shows it as live for ever. The entry point is withdrawn. A folder that is *already* shared still offers **Stop sharing**, because a share nobody can see is exactly the one you want to be able to clear, and there is no other way to. File sharing is unaffected and works end to end.
- **Address book sharing works, and was briefly withdrawn by mistake.** It was taken out alongside mail folders on 2026-08-27 on a report that it behaved the same way; the report was mistaken and the feature was put back the same day. Nothing was ever shown to be wrong with it, and Stalwart documents address books as shareable. Recorded because the withdrawal is in the history and would otherwise read as a finding. Shared books now appear in the Contacts pane under "Shared with me" rather than behind an account switch, and their contacts are offered when addressing a message.
- **Stalwart lets a sharee subscribe to a shared calendar but not a shared address book.** Subscribing is a write to the *owner's* account -- `isSubscribed` lives on the collection, not on the reader -- and 0.16.19 refuses it for a book shared read-only: `AddressBook/set` answers successfully with the id in `notUpdated`, `forbidden`, *"You are not allowed to modify this address book."* The identical `Calendar/set` on a shared calendar is accepted. **Confirmed live on 0.16.19 (2026-08-27)** from a second account holding both shares, which is the only place it shows: from the owner's own account the write succeeds and everything looks fine. So ihasmail asks the server first, because a preference the server holds is one every client agrees about, and keeps the answer in its own synced settings (`addedShares`) when the server will not. Two things this cost, both worth remembering: the refusal arrives as a *successful* response, so the code that ignored `notUpdated` saw nothing wrong and the button simply did nothing; and it is invisible from the owner's account, so it took two browsers signed in as two accounts to find at all. The mock now refuses the same write for the same reason, since one that accepted it agreed with the belief that shipped.
- **`shareWith` is not returned unless a client asks for it by name.** A `Calendar/get` or `AddressBook/get` with no `properties` comes back without the field at all — not null, not empty, absent — **confirmed live on 0.16.19 (2026-08-27)** against a calendar and an address book that were genuinely shared with another account: omit the list and there is no `shareWith`; name it and the sharee is right there. Every consequence was silent. Nothing was badged as shared, "Stop sharing" never appeared because nothing looked shared, and the share dialog opened on *"not shared with anyone yet"* over a live share — so the one screen that existed to manage sharing was the one most confidently wrong about it. Files never had this, because `fileNodeProps` had always named the property; calendars, address books and mail folders fetched everything and got less. Mail folders mattered in a way of their own: sharing one is withdrawn, and the only way to clear a share already made is a **Stop sharing** entry that appears when a folder looks shared — so without the property the escape hatch for the exact situation it was built for was invisible. The mock now omits it the same way, since one that hands it over unasked lets a client that never asks look correct everywhere except against a real server.
- **`shareWith` is not returned unless a client asks for it by name.** A `Calendar/get` or `AddressBook/get` with no `properties` comes back without the field at all — not null, not empty, absent — **confirmed live on 0.16.19 (2026-08-27)** against a calendar and an address book that were genuinely shared with another account: omit the list and there is no `shareWith`; name it and the sharee is right there. Every consequence was silent. Nothing was badged as shared, "Stop sharing" never appeared because nothing looked shared, and the share dialog opened on *"not shared with anyone yet"* over a live share — so the one screen that existed to manage sharing was the one most confidently wrong about it. Files never had this, because `fileNodeProps` had always named the property; calendars, address books and mail folders fetched everything and got less. Mail folders mattered in a way of their own: sharing one is withdrawn, and the only way to clear a share already made is a **Stop sharing** entry that appears when a folder looks shared — so without the property the escape hatch for the exact situation it was built for was invisible. The mock omitted it the same way, since one that hands it over unasked lets a client that never asks look correct everywhere except against a real server. **0.16.21 fixed this for calendars and address books**: with `properties` omitted, `Calendar/get` and `AddressBook/get` now return every property, `shareWith` included — **confirmed live on 0.16.21 (2026-09-06)**. `Mailbox/get` on the same server still leaves it out, so the mock now hides it for mail folders alone, and ihasmail keeps naming the property everywhere.
- **Stalwart's `x:PublicKey` registry works, and ihasmail deliberately does not expose it.** A Settings section for it has been built twice — [PR #67](https://github.com/Coffey-Labs/ihasmail/pull/67), closed 2026-08-26, and [PR #285](https://github.com/Coffey-Labs/ihasmail/pull/285) — and withdrawn both times, for a reason that has nothing to do with the server: **nothing in ihasmail signs, encrypts, decrypts or verifies with a key**, so a page for managing them is furniture rather than a feature. It ends up telling the reader, in its own footnote, that adding a key does nothing. The registry is written up here rather than in [ROADMAP.md](ROADMAP.md) because what follows is established fact about Stalwart that cost a live probe, and losing it twice to a closed pull request was how the second attempt came to exist at all. Everything below was **confirmed live on 0.16.20 (2026-09-05)** from a normal account with no administrative rights, and the full round trip — create, read back, rename, patch, destroy — succeeded for both formats.
- **An ordinary user may read *and* write their own keys**, whatever the permissions table says: Stalwart documents every `sysPublicKey*` permission as administrative, and the server granted them anyway. A create carrying a malformed key was refused with `invalidProperties` naming `key` rather than `forbidden` — a rejection of the key, not of the person. Had the documentation been right, any such feature would have been useless to everybody but an administrator, which is why this was probed first.
@@ -80,7 +90,7 @@ works the same way — and dropped where 0.15 was the whole subject. Support for
- **Files on 0.16** — the pre-0.16 quirks this entry used to describe are gone with the support for them: `FileNode/query` masking directories out of its own results, `nodeType` not existing, and rights being a single `mayWrite`. What is left is what has actually been exercised on 0.16.19. Finding and creating a folder, creating a node with `nodeType`, uploading and downloading its blob, and pointing an existing node at a new one all ran live on 2026-08-26, as a side effect of the settings file. Rename, move and delete are **confirmed live on 0.16.19 (2026-08-26)** as well, which closes this out: what had been confirmed on 0.15.5 (2026-08-24) was the older code path, and that path no longer exists. Two fallbacks went with the removal and are worth knowing about: `ensureFolder` and `findInFolder` now filter on `parentId`/`isTopLevel` alone and match names client-side, since `name` is not a filter Stalwart is known to implement and one it does not know fails the whole query; and a refused filter or sort no longer drops the view into fetching every node in the account, which would have hidden a real fault behind a performance cliff nobody would notice.
- **Self-service credentials** — the registry path is **confirmed live** against Stalwart 0.16.19 (2026-08-25): app passwords created and revoked, password changed, 2FA enabled and disabled, with the browser session surviving the switch to an app password. The 0.15 REST path was confirmed live too, on 0.15.5 (2026-08-24), and has since been removed along with the rest of 0.15 support. The mock enforces the same rules the real server does (current password required, password policy, a TOTP code on every request once 2FA is on, app passwords exempt from it). Password changes are refused by Stalwart for accounts backed by an external directory (LDAP/SQL/OIDC); the server's own message is shown when that happens.
- **Scheduled send needs one setting turned on, and says nothing when it is off.** Stalwart advertises the delay in the account's `urn:ietf:params:jmap:submission` capability — `maxDelayedSend: 2592000` (30 days) and `FUTURERELEASE` among its `submissionExtensions`, and note it is the *account* capability, not the session-level one, which is empty. But the MTA only honours a hold when `futureRelease` is set under the session's MTA extensions, and [that setting defaults to `false`](https://stalw.art/docs/ref/object/mta-extensions/). With it off, Stalwart takes the `HOLDUNTIL` parameter, skips the hold and sends the message immediately **without an error** — the capability still says thirty days. So set `futureRelease` (to the longest hold you want to allow) before relying on this; a value shorter than 30 days is fine, and a request past it is refused honestly, with a `forbiddenMailFrom` naming the limit. `npm run dev:mock:no-future-release` reproduces the silent-drop case. ihasmail asks for the delay the way JMAP requires — a `HOLDUNTIL` parameter on the envelope's `mailFrom`, since RFC 8621 makes `sendAt` read-only and server-derived — and files the held message in a **Scheduled** folder, because `onSuccessUpdateEmail` would otherwise drop it in Sent the moment the submission is created. Nothing moves it out when the hold expires, so ihasmail reconciles the folder on the way in: released messages to Sent, cancelled ones back to Drafts. Three fixes this depends on landed in **0.16.17**, below the live instance's 0.16.19: `HOLDUNTIL` taking RFC 3339 date-times again (0.16.16 had it wanting Unix timestamps), `EmailSubmission/query` on `undoStatus` agreeing with `/get` about held submissions, and `EmailSubmission/get` without `ids` iterating the right index. The hold itself is now **confirmed against the live 0.16.19** (2026-08-25), once `futureRelease` was set to `30d` there: a submission carrying a `HOLDUNTIL` ten minutes out came back `pending`, with `sendAt` equal to the time asked for and a `250 2.1.5 Queued` from the MTA, rather than going out at once. Worth repeating that the capability is no evidence either way — it advertised `maxDelayedSend: 2592000` and `FUTURERELEASE` while the setting was still off. Only a submission tells you. The rest of the journey is **confirmed live too (2026-08-26)**: a hold expired and was delivered, and the **Scheduled** folder reconciled on the way in — a released message moved to Sent, a cancelled one back to Drafts. Nothing in Stalwart does that moving, so if ihasmail is never opened again the message still goes out; it is only the folder that waits to be tidied.
- **Stalwart 0.16 and RFC 8984 disagree about the calendar vocabulary, and the server only says so half the time.** A participant's address lives in `calendarAddress`, not RFC 8984's `sendTo`/`email`; the organizer is `organizerCalendarAddress`, not `replyTo`; and a recurrence is a single `recurrenceRule`, not a `recurrenceRules` array. Addressed the RFC's way, `CalendarEvent/set` **keeps the event and discards the whole participant map without an error** — guests disappeared on save and no invitation was ever sent, which is what [#26](https://github.com/Coffey-Labs/ihasmail/issues/26) reported. The array form of the rule is refused honestly, with `invalidProperties`, so recurring events could not be created at all and existing ones showed no repeat ([#30](https://github.com/Coffey-Labs/ihasmail/issues/30)). ihasmail now writes Stalwart's names and reads either, and the mock refuses what the real server refuses, since advertising the RFC spelling is precisely how this got as far as a live server. Verified against 0.16.19 on 2026-08-25, end to end: participants, organizer and rule all survive a create, an update and a re-read; an invitation to an external Gmail address arrived as an invite card, and the decline came back and was applied to the event (`needs-action` → `declined`, sequence 1). Cancelling the event notified the guest too. Adding guests to an event that had none, and clearing them again with `null`, both work on the update path, as does RSVP — which patches `participants/{key}/participationStatus` (and `participationComment`) rather than sending the whole map. That patch had to be aimed at the base event: through 0.16.19 `CalendarEvent/set` refused a synthetic id with *"Updating synthetic ids is not yet supported"*, which is why RSVP resolves `baseEventId` first. 0.16.20 accepts one, so that resolution is now a choice rather than the only option — an RSVP aimed at an occurrence would answer for that date alone. It still resolves the base, which is the answer people mean. Adding a *new* participant by patch is refused as well (`Patch operation failed`), so a changed guest list is written as the whole `participants` property. One more thing to know when reading this code: an expanded occurrence carries a `recurrenceId` but *no* rule of its own, and `baseEventId` is set on everything an expanded query returns — a one-off included, whose own id differs from its base — so neither is a test for recurrence.
- **Stalwart 0.16 and RFC 8984 disagree about the calendar vocabulary, and the server only says so half the time.** A participant's address lives in `calendarAddress`, not RFC 8984's `sendTo`/`email`; the organizer is `organizerCalendarAddress`, not `replyTo`; and a recurrence is a single `recurrenceRule`, not a `recurrenceRules` array. Addressed the RFC's way, `CalendarEvent/set` **keeps the event and discards the whole participant map without an error** — guests disappeared on save and no invitation was ever sent, which is what [#26](https://github.com/Coffey-Labs/ihasmail/issues/26) reported. The array form of the rule is refused honestly, with `invalidProperties`, so recurring events could not be created at all and existing ones showed no repeat ([#30](https://github.com/Coffey-Labs/ihasmail/issues/30)). ihasmail now writes Stalwart's names and reads either, and the mock refuses what the real server refuses, since advertising the RFC spelling is precisely how this got as far as a live server. Verified against 0.16.19 on 2026-08-25, end to end: participants, organizer and rule all survive a create, an update and a re-read; an invitation to an external Gmail address arrived as an invite card, and the decline came back and was applied to the event (`needs-action` → `declined`, sequence 1). Cancelling the event notified the guest too. Adding guests to an event that had none, and clearing them again with `null`, both work on the update path, as does RSVP — which patches `participants/{key}/participationStatus` (and `participationComment`) rather than sending the whole map. That patch had to be aimed at the base event: through 0.16.19 `CalendarEvent/set` refused a synthetic id with *"Updating synthetic ids is not yet supported"*, which is why RSVP resolves `baseEventId` first. 0.16.20 accepts one, so that resolution is now a choice rather than the only option — an RSVP aimed at an occurrence would answer for that date alone. It still resolves the base, which is the answer people mean. Adding a *new* participant by patch is refused as well (`Patch operation failed`), so a changed guest list is written as the whole `participants` property. One more thing to know when reading this code: an expanded occurrence carries a `recurrenceId` but *no* rule of its own, and `baseEventId` is set on everything an expanded query returns — a one-off included, whose own id differs from its base — so neither is a test for recurrence. Since 0.16.22 the same event read by its *stored* id answers `baseEventId: null` rather than its own id, which changes nothing here: a one-off read through the synthetic id an expanded query gave it still carries a base.
- **Free/busy between accounts needs no sharing, and calendar contents cannot be reached at all.** These are the two halves of the same finding, and the second is what makes the first safe. **Confirmed live on 0.16.20 (2026-09-01)** against the deployed instance: `Principal/getAvailability` was called for all seven principals the directory returns, none of whose calendars are shared with the calling account, and every one was answered — no `forbidden`, no error of any kind, from a server that refuses a malformed call instantly. It returns real data rather than a polite empty list: the caller's own principal reported one busy period against the one event in the next sixty days. And a `Principal` carries only `id`, `type`, `name`, `description` and `email` — **no `accountId`** — so there is no handle with which to ask for anybody's calendars. Free/busy is therefore not the weaker of two permissions, it is the only channel between two accounts, and it is open by default. That is the right posture and worth recording, because a client that assumed sharing was a precondition would hide a working feature behind a setting nobody needs to touch. **One thing this did not settle**: the other six principals reported nothing over a nine-month window, which is equally consistent with "those accounts have empty calendars" — likely, since the session reaches one account — and with "an unreadable principal answers with an empty list rather than an error". Distinguishing them needs a second account with an event in it, and until somebody has one, ihasmail assumes the pessimistic reading everywhere it matters: a participant it cannot read is drawn as unknown rather than as free.
- **An override can move an occurrence, and then `start` and `recurrenceId` mean two different times.** The slot stays where the rule put it and only the clock time moves. **Confirmed live on 0.16.20 (2026-08-31)**: one occurrence of a weekly 09:00 series moved to 14:00 came back `start: 2027-06-14T14:00:00` with `recurrenceId` still `2027-06-14T09:00:00`. This is the right behaviour and it is the reason `recurrenceId` is the handle ihasmail holds: it is the one name for an instance that survives *both* a renumbering and a move, so a mutation can always be re-resolved from it. Worth recording because the mock got it wrong in the other direction — it overwrote an override's `start` with the slot time, so a moved occurrence did not move, and per-occurrence *time* editing looked broken against the mock and correct against the server. Found by asking a real server rather than by reading the mock, which is the only way this kind of disagreement ever surfaces.