Files
cairnobs/docs/architecture.md
T
jcoffey-dev e57486add5 Position against Cribl as well as Splunk, and say what that costs us
Splunk and Cribl are not the same competitor and the claim is not the
same claim twice. Splunk is the destination and Cairn OBS replaces it,
which is what phases 0-7 were for. Cribl is the road: routing, reduction,
enrichment, redaction and replay on the way to wherever data is going.
Cairn OBS is already a road in shape -- agent, Redpanda, ingest -- and
exposes none of a pipeline's controls. The agent cannot filter, drop,
sample, mask or re-route anything; ingest normalises a schema and writes
it; there is exactly one destination and it is us.

Reconciling the two turns up something a cost-led project has to face
rather than paper over: most people buy Cribl because Splunk is expensive
per gigabyte, so being genuinely cheap per gigabyte removes the main
reason to buy Cribl in front of us. That makes the strongest pitch "one
system where there were two" rather than "we are also a pipeline vendor"
-- but that pitch only survives a buyer if we also do the four things
people buy a pipeline for that are not about spend: routing to several
destinations, redacting before data leaves the network, archive and
replay, and not being locked to one analytics vendor. Those are about
control, which is better ground anyway: cost advantages get matched and
architectural ones do not.

The consequence is uncomfortable and is written down as a decision rather
than left to be discovered: competing with Cribl means being able to send
data to S3, Splunk HEC, Elastic, OTLP and Kafka -- building features whose
purpose is to help data leave this platform. A project that refuses
lock-in in its licence and then builds it into its egress would be lying
about itself.

Four phases follow, ordered so each pays for itself: processing (8),
routing (9), archive and replay (10), fleet (11). Processing without
routing still shrinks what is stored; routing without processing forwards
everything and helps nobody.

One design decision is called out now because it collides with a
non-negotiable constraint. Cribl's rule language is JavaScript, and
embedding a JS engine in a statically-linked musl agent would end "no
glibc runtime deps" as a claim. The recommendation is a declarative rule
DSL -- matchers and typed actions, no arbitrary code -- deliberately less
expressive, small enough to audit and safe to push to ten thousand hosts.

The retention/TTL question in architecture.md is no longer deferrable and
now says so: Phase 10 asks it from the other side.
2026-09-04 16:29:29 -07:00

286 lines
20 KiB
Markdown

# Cairn OBS Architecture
> **Status:** Updated through Phase 4. The component map/diagram below is
> still the Phase 0 request path (agent → ingest → ClickHouse → api →
> web) — it was never redrawn for the full-text search, dashboards/
> alerting, or enterprise/ additions; see each phase's runbook
> (`/docs/phase-N-runbook.md`) for what was actually verified when it
> shipped. The component responsibilities table and the sections below
> the diagram are kept current. Phase 0's original framing ("draft,
> correct as needed") still applies to anything not yet built.
## Mission
Open-core, Kubernetes-native centralized logging platform. Compete with
Splunk on features; win on cost-per-GB, a modern language stack, and
multi-tenant RBAC that's actually honest about its guarantees.
Positioned against Cribl as well as Splunk — the destination and the road
are separate claims with separate consequences, worked through in
[positioning.md](positioning.md). The pipeline controls that implies
(processing, routing to third-party destinations, archive and replay, fleet
configuration) are not built, and the data path today has exactly one
destination.
## Component map
```
┌──────────┐ gRPC/mTLS ┌──────────┐ produce ┌───────────┐ consume ┌────────────┐
│ agent │ ────────────▶ │ ingest │ ──────────▶ │ Redpanda │ ────────▶ │ ingest │
│ (Rust) │ │ (Go) │ │ (Kafka API)│ │ consumer │
└──────────┘ └──────────┘ └───────────┘ │ (Go) │
└──────┬─────┘
│ batch INSERT
┌────────────┐
│ ClickHouse │
└─────┬──────┘
│ SQL
┌───────────▼───────────┐
│ api (Go: gRPC+REST) │
└───────────┬───────────┘
│ REST
┌───────────▼───────────┐
│ web (SvelteKit) │
└────────────────────────┘
```
Decision (confirmed 2026-08-12): Redpanda stays in the Phase 0 path. The
`ingest` service's gRPC front end produces to Redpanda rather than writing
ClickHouse directly; a separate consumer path reads from Redpanda and batches
inserts into ClickHouse. This exercises the real transport layer from day
one instead of deferring it, and keeps Kafka credentials off the edge agent.
## Storage / query split
- **ClickHouse** is the analytical store of record for structured log data:
timestamp, host, service, severity, message, plus a `Map(String,String)`
for arbitrary structured fields. Partitioned by day, ordered by
`(service, timestamp)`.
- **Tantivy** (Phase 1) will provide full-text indexing over the `message`
field and unstructured payloads, queried out-of-band from ClickHouse and
joined by a log identifier. Not built in Phase 0.
- **Schema-on-write** using OTel semantic conventions as the default log
schema; schema-on-read fallback for unstructured/raw text that doesn't fit
the structured columns (captured via the `Map` column and/or a raw
passthrough field).
- **Postgres** (Phase 3) holds control-plane config only — dashboards,
panels, notification targets, alert rules/state, delivery log, and
(Phase 4) tenants/users/tenant_memberships/audit_log. Never log data;
ClickHouse/Tantivy stay the only place a log record itself lives. See
`/docs/phase-3-dashboard-design.md` for why ClickHouse's MergeTree
family isn't a fit for this (no real row-level locking/transactional
read-modify-write).
This split is not to be changed without discussion — see PROJECT-SPEC.md.
## Component responsibilities
| Component | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| `agent` (Rust, musl) | Tail a log file or read journald; parse RFC 5424 syslog with raw passthrough fallback; batch; ship via gRPC/mTLS to `ingest`. Windows (ETW/Event Log) code exists but is unverified on real Windows hardware — see `/agent/README.md`. |
| `proto` | Shared `.proto` contracts for agent↔ingest and api↔search gRPC, versioned independently of either side. |
| `transport` | Redpanda docker-compose + topic provisioning scripts. No application code. |
| `ingest` (Go) | gRPC server accepting agent connections; produces normalized OTel-log-like records to Redpanda; separate consumer reads from Redpanda and batch-writes to ClickHouse. No tenant concept — every record lands in the one shared `logs` table regardless of source (see "Tenant isolation" below). |
| `storage` | ClickHouse schema migrations + docker-compose for local/homelab. |
| `search` (Rust, Phase 1) | Consumes the same Redpanda topic `ingest` does (own offset tracking), builds a Tantivy full-text index over `message`, serves matches over gRPC. Writes always go to one shared (default) index (`ingest` isn't tenant-aware); reads can be scoped per-tenant via `SearchRequest.tenant_id` and `src/registry.rs`'s `IndexRegistry` (Phase 4) — see "Tenant isolation" below. |
| `api` (Go) | gRPC + REST gateway. `POST /query` compiles pipe-syntax or raw SQL to one IR, executed across ClickHouse/Tantivy (`/docs/query-language-design.md`). `internal/dashboards` is CRUD only — panel query execution happens client-side, reusing `/query`. `internal/authz` (Phase 4) enforces RBAC via a network call to `enterprise-auth`, never an import. |
| `alerting` (Go, Phase 3) | Evaluates alert rules on an interval, calls `api`'s `POST /query` (via a `RoleService` credential once Phase 4 auth is configured — see `/docs/phase-4-isolation-design.md`'s alerting↔api gap), delivers firing/resolved notifications (webhook/Slack/PagerDuty). |
| `enterprise` (Go, AGPLv3 — see "Licensing boundary" below, Phase 4) | OIDC login (`internal/loginhandler`'s `/auth/oidc/login`+`/auth/oidc/callback`) and SAML login (`/auth/saml/login`+`/auth/saml/acs`, via `internal/saml`'s `crewjam/saml` wiring) — both a real IdP round trip, each verified with a real fake IdP (`coreos/go-oidc`'s `oidctest`, `crewjam/saml`'s `samlidp`) but not a real external one, RBAC storage (`internal/rbacstore`), session/service-token issuance (`internal/session`), the append-only audit log (`internal/audit`), `enterprise-auth`'s HTTP surface (`/internal/authorize`, `/auth/features`), per-tenant ClickHouse provisioning (`internal/tenantprovision`) and query routing (`internal/chrunner`), and `cmd/enterprise-api` — a second binary combining core's `api/queryapi`/`api/dashboards` handlers with these tenant-aware implementations. Never imported by core — see "Licensing boundary" below. Also `internal/searchclient` (per-tenant Tantivy routing, wired the same way into `search`). |
| `web` (SvelteKit, static build) | Query bar, dashboards, alerts, and (Phase 4) a settings page that renders SSO status via a runtime capability check (`GET /auth/features`) rather than bundling `enterprise/`'s components directly — an architectural choice (core builds and runs standalone) that predates and doesn't depend on Phase 6's relicensing. |
| `cli` (`cairnobsctl`) | `ping`, `query`, `dashboards` (list/get/apply), `alerts` (list/get/apply). `$CAIRNOBSCTL_TOKEN`, if set, is forwarded as a Bearer credential (Phase 4). |
| `deploy` | A Helm chart covering every `docker-compose.yml` service, plus (Phase 4) a small Go Operator managing one CRD (`Tenant`) that provisions a per-tenant ClickHouse credential Secret. Never applied to a live cluster in the environment this was built in — see `/deploy/README.md`'s verification section before trusting it. |
## Tenant isolation model (Phase 4)
Full design rationale: `/docs/phase-4-isolation-design.md`. Full honest
accounting of what's actually enforced vs. designed-only:
`/docs/security/threat-model.md` — read that before assuming any claim
below holds for log data specifically.
**As designed:** one dedicated ClickHouse database + narrowly-granted
user per tenant (never the shared `default`/admin credential), one
dedicated Tantivy index directory per tenant, `system.*` access revoked
per tenant, connections resolved from an immutable per-tenant map (never
a shared pool with session-level `USE`). Isolation lives at the
**connection layer** — every query, compiled or raw SQL, is forced
through a tenant-scoped connection the database's own access control
enforces — not at the query-compiler layer, since Phase 2's raw-SQL
escape hatch is opaque to any compiler-injected filter.
**As built, currently:**
- Role-based access control (`api/authz`) is live on `/query`
and `/dashboards`, resolved via `enterprise-auth` over HTTP.
- Control-plane tenant scoping is live for dashboards
(`api/dashboards`'s store filters every query by the
authenticated identity's tenant, never a client-supplied field).
- The `alerting``api` service-identity gap (task 2's finding) is
closed: a `RoleService` credential, distinct from every human role.
- **ClickHouse connection-layer isolation is built**, but lives in a
second binary: `enterprise/internal/tenantprovision` (real `CREATE
DATABASE`/`CREATE USER`/`GRANT` against ClickHouse) and
`enterprise/internal/chrunner` (a per-tenant connection registry
implementing `api/querylang/executor.SQLRunner`, resolving the
right tenant's connection from the authenticated identity in request
context) are wired into `enterprise/cmd/enterprise-api` — a binary
that imports both `api`'s handler packages and enterprise's
tenant-aware implementations (the allowed `enterprise → api` import
direction; core still never imports `enterprise/`). Real integration
tests assert a tenant cannot read another tenant's database by
fully-qualified name, and that `system.query_log`/`system.tables`/
`SHOW DATABASES` don't leak across tenants either — written but not
yet run against a live ClickHouse in this environment, see
`/docs/security/threat-model.md` and `/docs/phase-4-runbook.md`'s
verification-status sections. Plain `api/cmd/api` still exists,
unchanged, with its single shared connection — nothing forces a
deployment to run `enterprise-api` instead, and nothing flags it if it
doesn't.
- **Tantivy index-layer isolation is built, and verified.**
`search/src/registry.rs`'s `IndexRegistry` resolves
`SearchRequest.tenant_id` (added to `proto/sentry/search/v1/
search.proto`) to its own on-disk index, opened on demand;
`enterprise/internal/searchclient` sets that field from the
authenticated request identity, the same "read from ctx, fail closed"
shape `chrunner` uses. Unlike the ClickHouse pieces, this one actually
ran in the environment it was built in — Tantivy is an embedded
library, so the cross-tenant isolation probe needed no live database
or Docker to execute for real, and it passed.
- **Ingest identity, ClickHouse write-routing, and Tantivy write-routing
are all now built.** `ingest` (AGPL core) gained an optional `TenantResolver`
(`ingest/internal/grpcserver`): an agent presents a per-tenant bearer
credential (`enterprise-auth -create-ingest-credential-tenant=<id>`
mints one, only its hash stored), validated over the network via a new
`POST /internal/authorize-ingest` endpoint (never an `enterprise/`
import — same "network boundary, not import boundary" shape
`api/authz.Authorizer` already uses), and the resolved tenant ID rides
as a `tenant_id` Kafka message header on every record produced.
`enterprise/cmd/enterprise-ingest` (another "second binary," mirroring
`enterprise-api`) consumes that tag: it reuses `ingest/consumer`'s own
flush loop with `enterprise/internal/chwriter.Registry` swapped in as
the writer, routing each batch's records to a per-tenant ClickHouse
connection (one per tenant, built from `rbacstore.
ListProvisionedDataSources` — the same source `chrunner` already uses
for reads), fail-closed on an untagged or unprovisioned tenant.
Building it found and fixed a real bug: `tenantprovision.
ProvisionClickHouse` originally granted a tenant's ClickHouse user
`SELECT` only, which would have made every real per-tenant write fail
with a permission error — fixed by granting `SELECT, INSERT` (one
credential, both directions; no cross-tenant boundary is crossed by
also allowing INSERT within a tenant's own database). `search`'s
independent Redpanda consumer (a different codebase — Rust — and a
different process, not reachable through either `ingest` or
`enterprise-ingest`) is now write-routed too:
`search/src/consumer.rs` resolves each record's `tenant_id` header
through the *same* `IndexRegistry` the read side
(`search/src/registry.rs` + `enterprise/internal/searchclient`)
already used, and writes there instead of always into the default
index. No "second binary" needed here, unlike ClickHouse — Tantivy has
no grant system to gate a separately-credentialed binary behind
(originally written when that credential was commercially licensed;
the split was never actually about which license `enterprise/`
carried, only about ClickHouse's grant system being the thing worth
isolating), so `IndexRegistry` already lived directly in this AGPL-core
binary, and read/write just share it. The active-tenant gap this design left open
is now closed too: `search/src/tenants.rs`'s `ActiveTenantTracker`
polls a new `GET /internal/active-tenants` endpoint on
`enterprise-auth``search` has no Postgres access, so unlike
`chwriter.Registry`'s direct `rbacstore` query or the read side's
`searchclient.TenantChecker`, this needed a network call instead (the
same "network boundary, not import boundary" shape `ingest`'s
`TenantResolver` already uses against the same service, authenticated
with a RoleService credential like `alerting``api`) — and
`consumer.rs` refuses any tagged record whose tenant isn't in the
polled allowlist. Off unless configured, fail-closed on the first
fetch, last-known-good on later refresh failures; see
`search/src/tenants.rs`'s doc comment for the full design and
`search/src/registry.rs`'s for how mechanism (index lifecycle) and
policy (the gate) responsibilities split.
- `deploy/operator`'s `Tenant` CRD and `enterprise-api -provision-tenant`
are now unified, deliberately lightweight: `-provision-tenant` stays
the sole real actor (ClickHouse + `rbacstore`), and now also syncs its
real result into the `Tenant` CRD (`enterprise/internal/tenantcrd`) --
a real credential Secret, and status fields the reconciler
(`deploy/operator/internal/controller`) derives `Phase`/`Ready` from
rather than independently guessing. The reconciler itself gained no
new credentials and still never touches ClickHouse/Postgres.
**The deployment-topology gap is closed for both Helm and
docker-compose**: `deploy/helm/cairnobs/templates/api.yaml`/
`enterprise-api.yaml` are mutually exclusive on `enterprise.enabled`,
rendering to the same Service name and port either way, so a
Helm-deployed cluster can't accidentally run the wrong binary — the same
flag that turns on RBAC/audit/SSO now also chooses the query binary.
`docker-compose.yml`'s `api`/`enterprise-api` services are the same
mutually-exclusive choice via `COMPOSE_PROFILES` (`.env` defaults to
plain `api`), sharing a host-port/network-alias trick so `alerting`/
`web` need no conditional config either way. With both storage engines'
connection/index-layer mechanisms built, deployment topology enforced at
both the Helm and docker-compose layers, the two provisioning
mechanisms unified, both storage engines' write paths per-tenant-routed,
and the tenant-picker frontend page now built and browser-verified
(`web/src/routes/select-tenant`, `api/httpserver.WithCredentialedCORS`
— see `/PROJECT-SPEC.md`'s Phase 4 section and `/web/README.md`'s "Tenant
picker" section), the remaining gaps in this phase are entirely the
already-disclosed live-verification caveats: the ClickHouse/Postgres-
backed pieces have never run against a real database in this
environment, and nothing here has been tried against a real external
IdP or a real running multi-container deployment.
## Licensing boundary
**AGPLv3 for the entire project**, including `enterprise/` — as of
Phase 6, there is no separate commercial-license carve-out anywhere in
this repo. `enterprise/` (added Phase 4 under a commercial-license stub,
covering SSO, RBAC storage, audit logging) was relicensed to AGPLv3 in
Phase 6; see `/docs/compliance/license-audit-report.md` for the full
record of that decision, including the deliberate business-model
consequence: anyone, including competitors, can now legally self-host or
fork those features under AGPLv3's terms.
Core still never imports from `enterprise/` — enforced in CI by
`hack/check-tenant-boundary.sh`, which greps every build for the import
edge — but this is now purely an **architectural** boundary, not a
licensing one. It exists so core stays buildable and deployable with
zero multi-tenant mechanism present regardless of what license either
side carries, and so tenant identity resolution stays server-side rather
than trusting a request parameter — see `/docs/phase-4-isolation-design.md`.
Where core needs a decision only `enterprise/` can make (is this request
authorized, what SSO is configured), it calls `enterprise-auth` over
plain HTTP instead (`api/authz.HTTPAuthorizer`, `web`'s
`GET /auth/features`) — the same "network boundary, not import boundary"
shape `/alerting``api` already used before `enterprise/` existed.
## Non-negotiables carried from PROJECT-SPEC.md
- Rust agent: statically linked musl, `x86_64-unknown-linux-musl` and
`aarch64-unknown-linux-musl`, no glibc runtime deps.
- Windows support via native ETW/Event Log API, not WSL — designed
(Phase 1) but still unverified on real Windows hardware.
- Every UI action maps to a documented REST/gRPC call — no UI-only logic.
- Pinned stack (see PROJECT-SPEC.md table) — no substitutions without discussion.
## Explicitly out of scope (current, Phase 4)
Per `/PROJECT-SPEC.md`'s Phase 4 non-goals and `/docs/security/threat-model.md`:
deny-override permission grants, a data retention/deletion policy for
deprovisioned tenants, general multi-cluster orchestration in `/deploy`,
and any defense against a privileged ClickHouse/Postgres administrator —
every isolation and audit-integrity guarantee here is a structural
defense against application-layer bugs, not an operational control.
## Open questions for you to resolve
- Retention/TTL policy for the ClickHouse `logs` table — not specified yet.
This was deferred until storage sizing became a real concern; Phase 10's
archive/replay work is where it stops being deferrable, since tiering to
object storage and reading back from it is the same question asked from
the other side. See [positioning.md](positioning.md).
- Exact OTel log schema field mapping (which OTel resource/log attributes
map to which ClickHouse columns) — Phase 0 uses a minimal subset
(timestamp, host, service, severity, message, attributes map); full
mapping deferred.
- mTLS certificate provisioning/rotation story for agents — Phase 0 will use
a static dev CA and manually issued certs; production PKI design is
out of scope here.