From f9c19a153b0680be3c536a9c07814a5dfb30bec5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Coffey Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:39:58 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Masked email: INBUXA most likely holds no masks --- features/masked-email.md | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/features/masked-email.md b/features/masked-email.md index 8fa5c11..5018a13 100644 --- a/features/masked-email.md +++ b/features/masked-email.md @@ -292,9 +292,10 @@ deleted, and nothing was left. No upstream code was read. 8. **How many masks INBUXA holds.** Operator's estimate, 2026-09-18: fewer than 20 special addresses in all, 7 on the operator's own account and the - rest postmaster addresses. Those may be ordinary account aliases rather - than masks. Aliases carry over unchanged and aren't part of this feature. - If none are masks, the compatibility test (acceptance 12) has no existing + rest postmaster addresses. The operator confirmed none of the 7 has the + masked format, so they're ordinary aliases, and INBUXA most likely holds no + masks at all. Aliases carry over unchanged and aren't part of this feature. + With no masks, the compatibility test (acceptance 12) has no existing masks to carry over, and instead checks that upstream-shaped addresses created on a copy before cutover still deliver after it. Count masks exactly (`x:MaskedEmail/query` as an admin) during the cutover dry run