It had none: no security policy, no contributing guide, no code of conduct,
no sponsor link, and no CI. A public repository with an administrative
interface in it should at least say where to send a vulnerability, so that
part names what is worth reporting here specifically -- a session acting
beyond its permissions, one tenant's data reaching another, a token landing
somewhere that outlives the session -- and where a report goes if it turns
out to belong to the server or to upstream.
CI is what a contributor can run: typecheck, lint, test, build. Nothing in
it needs a live server, so a red run means the code, not the runner.
