The dress rehearsal reported MISSING ACCOUNT [email protected] after a
migration that lost nothing: SMTP on the migrated instance accepts mail for
it, while an address that does not exist is refused, so the account is there.
Enumeration is permission-scoped. The "before" snapshot was read by an
account with full rights; the "after" snapshot by one whose admin role the
migration had not carried across - proven one step earlier, where the quota
rebuild was refused as unauthorised. It was shown a fraction of the accounts
and the comparison called the remainder lost.
"Missing" and "not permitted to see" are different findings and only one of
them is about the data. When the migrated instance shows fewer accounts than
existed, the result now says COULD NOT VERIFY and names the reader, rather
than asserting a loss the evidence does not support. It still fails the run:
an unverified migration is not a verified one, and the fix is to re-check
with an admin account, which --resume makes cheap.
Counting accounts is not a strong enough signal to tell the two cases apart,
so it does not try to - it reports the ambiguity instead of guessing.
Also fixes the test fake, which ignored ?types= and returned domains as
individuals, making every account count in these tests wrong.
jcoffey-dev
019696bce7