Both the versioning comment and the README described 1.0 in the past
tense, which reads as though it has shipped and the numbering was
changed in response. It has not. The old `2.16.x` scheme was dropped
over where it would end up, not where it ended up, and the surrounding
conditionals are simplified to match: "would sort", "would read", rather
than "would have".
The badge quoted in the comment also said 0.16.19; it says 0.16.20 now.
Comments and prose only -- no behaviour changes.
jcoffey-dev
b0cb73a924