Mechanical, low-risk follow-up -- no new architectural question, no new
external service, no new write path. Each of sentry_dashboard,
sentry_alert_rule, and sentry_notification_target gets a matching data
source: a single Required id attribute in, every other attribute
Computed out, backed by the exact same getDashboard/getRule/
getNotificationTarget client methods and dashboardModelFromAPI/
alertRuleModelFromAPI/notificationTargetModelFromAPI conversion
functions the resources already use and already have tests for -- these
data sources add no new client code at all, just a thin
datasource.DataSource wrapper reusing what Create/Read/Update/Delete
already exercise.
sentry_notification_target's data source carries the same secret
caveat its resource does (Sensitive, but alerting's GET /targets/{id}
returns it unredacted, so it's a real plaintext value in Terraform
state) -- named again here rather than assumed obvious from the
resource's own docs.
Verified: provider_test.go's new schema-validation tests confirm each
data source's id is Required and everything else Computed, no
Terraform binary needed. Three new real acceptance tests
(TestAccDashboardDataSource_basic and its two siblings) each create a
resource then look it up via the matching data source, using
resource.TestCheckResourceAttrPair to prove the data source's Read
actually agrees with what the resource wrote -- not just that both
compile. Skip-gated by TF_ACC same as the existing six acceptance
tests, and needs the same live api/alerting services this environment
has no Docker access to bring up, so not run here -- same disclosed gap
as everything else Docker-gated in this repo.
jcoffey-dev
eb38611aa8