The repository has carried only a LICENSE and a README, which scores 42%
on GitHub's community profile against ihasmail's 85% and, more to the
point, leaves someone who finds a vulnerability with nowhere to send it
but a public issue.
SECURITY.md is the one that matters. It names cross-tenant data exposure
as the highest-severity class, since that is the guarantee this project
actually sells and the one hardest to be sure of. It also puts the two
knowingly unverified areas in front of a reporter -- Phase 4 beyond its
audit-logging guarantees, and the Windows agent, which has never run on
Windows -- so a finding there is not mistaken for a regression in a path
that was ever verified. And it declares the demo credential out of scope
explicitly: it is published on purpose, prefilled on the login page and
baked into the web bundle, so a report about it costs everyone time.
CONTRIBUTING.md is written for this tree rather than adapted loosely from
the other one: the storage/query split, PostgreSQL being control-plane
only, the enterprise/ module boundary core never imports across, and the
fact that the whole repository is AGPLv3 with no feature gate. Setup is
the compose path from the README, including COMPOSE_PROFILES, so the two
cannot drift into disagreeing.
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md is Contributor Covenant 2.0, copied from ihasmail with
one fix: that copy never filled in the contact placeholder, so its
reporting sentence ends at "responsible for enforcement at ." -- a code of
conduct with no way to report anything. Worth fixing there too.
Signed-off-by: John Coffey <[email protected]>
